Blowing it/I Live For That Look: 1 song or 2 songs? and why?

[FlyingCloud]

there are good reasons for either of the two options, I think
I’m really curious what you all think!

…and please drop some words about why you decided for the one or other possibility!

[Cloud9]

Its 2 songs
He only played blowin it on Martin & Me
Thats my 2 cents

[kracked873]

its defientely one song.. when its electric they never dont play live for that look.. and he just writes blowin it on the setlist even though they play both

also i think blowin it sans live for that look acoustic.. its just not that same cause its like half a song therefore it doesnt appeal to me much

[FlyingCloud]

of course on Green Mind it says clearly:

Quote:

Track 3: Blowing It
Track 4: I Live For That Look

… so that’s a point for the 2 songs theory, but I’d really want to know if there is any gap between the 2 tracks on the Green Mind vinyl?

[ammaringnyc]

I think it is both 2 songs and one song. Thus two separate track numbers and names but it is also one song because they flow into each other with no break when you listen to even the cd. I’ve always thought the brige between them was one particular note of the guitar. Anyway he probably doesn’t play them both live because he didn’t play that many solos accoustic untill he got the looper. And the solo in between is what bridges them together. I have never heard of him playing just I live for that look. My point about the accoustic soloing is supported by the fact that he does play both and the solo in between on the rolling stone sessions because there is a bass for him to solo off of.

[Author]

Posts