FreakScene.net

Dinosaur Jr. Fan Community

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
    • News
  • Artists
  • Song Lyrics
  • Links
  • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
  • Forums
    • Latest Topics
    • Dinosaur/J News & Discussions
    • Dinosaur Related Discussions
    • General Discussions
    • Bootleg Trading
    • Guitar Room
    • Fossils
    • Get Discovered
    • Introductions
    • Site Suggestions + Comments
    • Live reviews / meetups
    • Open Topic
    • Area 51
    • Musicians & D.I.Y. Artists

The Malcom Report 4/11

Forums › Forums › General Discussions › Open Topic › The Malcom Report 4/11

  • This topic has 19 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 23 years, 7 months ago by Bucky Ramone.
Viewing 5 posts - 16 through 20 (of 20 total)
← 1 2
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 13, 2002 at 11:58 pm #69090
    malcom
    Participant

      Alison 2 things:
      1)I can’t say why women aren’t in the science and math areas, many women I know are majoring in such areas

      2)This is a freshman english class, we are learning the different styles of papers, this is one type of paper. It doesn’t have to be about people, that was my own decision.

      Half Man- Sorry, Third person perspective only

      Den buck- thank you, but why should it be an inverse correlation? I’m saying that people who play softer seem to be better musicians usually, pay attention at the store and you’ll notice that. Or read an interview with, say, Leo Kottke, followed by one with Slash or Dimebag. You’ll see my point.

      April 14, 2002 at 2:15 am #69091
      malcom
      Participant

        Here’s my big question:
        What makes something stereotypical and offensive?

        This has been going through my head ever since this topic went up. Why is it that a woman doing an essay on the different types of men (the cheapskate, etc. . .) isn’t sexist or offensive at all, but my not mentioning women in an essay can be construed as offensive? This isn’t another white male complaining about "reverse descrimination"(a half-assed term) this is a serious question.

        April 14, 2002 at 7:55 am #69092
        Bucky Ramone
        Participant

          DEFINTION OF CORRELATION:

          </font><blockquote><font>quote:</font><hr><font> The main result of a correlation is called the correlation coefficient (or "r"). It ranges from -1.0 to +1.0. The closer r is to +1 or -1, the more closely the two variables are related.

          If r is close to 0, it means there is no relationship between the variables. If r is positive, it means that as one variable gets larger the other gets larger. If r is negative it means that as one gets larger, the other gets smaller (often called an "inverse" correlation). </font><hr></blockquote><font>Correlation: More dB’s ==> more talent, better musician
          Inverse correlation: Less dB’s ==> more talent, better musician

          Where dB stands for decibel (and not for den Buck, who studied physics and mathematics for some years, a long time ago) <img> <img> <img>

          April 14, 2002 at 4:42 pm #69093
          malcom
          Participant

            And in english that means. . .

            -Malcom (who can barley figure out tips in his head)

            April 19, 2002 at 2:28 am #69094
            Bucky Ramone
            Participant

              </font><blockquote><font>quote:</font><hr><font>Originally posted by EvIl MaLCoM-MiDwESt SuRfeR:
              <strong>And in english that means. . .

              -Malcom (who can barley figure out tips in his head)</strong></font><hr></blockquote><font>Correlation: Louder —> Smarter
              Inverse correlation: Louder —> Dumber

              <img> <img> <img>

            • Author
              Posts
            Viewing 5 posts - 16 through 20 (of 20 total)
            ← 1 2
            • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
            Log In
            Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Illustratr by WordPress.com.